Chuckle #492 | November 6th, 2012
scroll down to leave a comment
Pundits
never stop yakking about election bellwethers, but not a single one of them has
mentioned the dogs. Pets are a reflection of their owner’s needs
and desires. Isn’t that the reason why, over
time, people start to resemble their dogs?
The relationship between man and dog is especially close and often weird.
And
now it’s become political.
When
my dog first peed on a Romney/Ryan lawn sign, I glanced furtively around to
make sure no one was watching. I was
worried that folks would boo and jeer and make rude gestures, and maybe even shoot
me. After all, I live in the most
Republican town in all New England. Gun
ownership is high and, given a sympathetic judge, that ‘deer at dusk’ defense will
work every time.
But
then I started to think about what makes a dog pee on some things and not on
others. Was my dog showing approval or
disdain by ‘marking’ the Republican sign? Was he pro-Mitt or anti-Mitt?
Hmmmm. An intriguing question.
So
I set out to find a neighborhood Democrat with big enough maracas to put an
Obama/Biden sign up on the most sacred of all turf, their own front lawn. We walked and walked. I became tired. The dog became tired. I started to worry that, statistically
speaking, the distance travelled could affect the validity of the experiment.
By
that time, my dog had already peed on five hapless branches, three hydrants and
another dog. Would he have any pee left,
and if so, how would he choose to use it?
I
realized that Quinnipiac or CNN would have to undertake this study at a later
date in a more controlled environment, but for now, I really wanted to see what
would happen if and when we found an Obama sign.
And
lo and behold, three miles later, there it was! We hurried over. He sniffed, he circled, and then…he
lifted! Only a few drops came out, but that says something doesn’t it? Something important I’d like to think.
Either
my dog just likes to pee on stuff that sits enticingly close to the road, or my
dog is …UNDECIDED!
This
is a really big discovery. Given the close relationship between man and
dog, the chances are pretty high that an undecided voter could be influenced by
his dog. As we all know, the Ohio ‘undecideds’
will choose our next president. How many
of them own dogs? Are these dogs influential enough to gain a proxy vote? What is the partisan
breakdown of lawn signs in the most critical, contested areas?
Which
candidate has (I just can’t resist), a ‘leg up’ over the other?
Given
this momentous, breaking news, how should the campaigns react? For starters, I recommend that Barack and
Mitt stop wasting their time kissing
babies in down and out diners, and start
handing out milkbones, because this election has gone to the dogs.
An
undecided voter is genuinely confused.
All they want is a ‘sign’ to point them in the right direction. Like religion, it doesn’t have to make
sense. So why wouldn’t they look to man’s best friend for a voting cue?
If
you’re looking for a ‘sign’ of where
this election is headed, forget about the fancy polls, they are way too
scientific.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Get your Weekly Chuckle via email at www.laughoutloudmom.com
Copyright 2012, LOLmom.com, Greenwich CT
No comments:
Post a Comment